Dedicated to the world-renowned trafficwomen of the DPRK
 
PORTALPORTAL   FORUM  GalleryGallery  FAQFAQ  SearchSearch  MemberlistMemberlist  HomeHome  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  
Post new topic   Reply to topicShare | 
 

 100% Vote for Kim Jong Il

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
catcher22
청동 party member 청동


Posts : 179
Join date : 2008-07-13

PostSubject: 100% Vote for Kim Jong Il   Tue Mar 10, 2009 4:01 pm

Some not-so-shocking news from the Korean peninsula courtesy of none other than Al Jazeera: It appears that the results are in from Sunday's national elections in North Korea and that Kim Jong-il has won re-election with, you guessed it, 100 percent of the votes.

After winning 100 percent of the votes, Kim Jong Il was elected Deputy to the 12th Supreme People’s Assembly of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), according to an official announcement on March 9.
As scheduled, the first session of the new Supreme People’s Army will be held in early April and will re-elect Kim Jong Il as chairman of the DPRK National Defence Commission.

The DPRK’s law regulates that there can be only one candidate in each electoral district. Kim Jong Il was the candidate for Constituency No. 333 and won the support of all the voters there.



"DPRK’s law regulates that there can be only one candidate in each electoral district"
laugh at that
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Mayor_of_Pyongyang
청동 party member 청동
avatar

Posts : 139
Join date : 2009-01-16
Location : Democratic People's Republic of NYC

PostSubject: Re: 100% Vote for Kim Jong Il   Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:21 pm

Better than no candidate, I guess....but then again, maybe not..... Laughing
Back to top Go down
View user profile
w511
* party member *


Posts : 28
Join date : 2009-02-18

PostSubject: Re: 100% Vote for Kim Jong Il   Tue Mar 10, 2009 11:30 pm

Wow another close election for thegreat DICtator!! kim jong-il laugh at that
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Jong-Il's Hair Apparent
official minder moderator
avatar

Posts : 213
Join date : 2008-07-14

PostSubject: Re: 100% Vote for Kim Jong Il   Thu Mar 12, 2009 8:17 am

At least they never need to worry about having a recount or a runoff. I wonder if the Dear Leader stays up all night watching the election returns on TV? ....... "Well, Tom, we have some new numbers coming in .... with 37% of the districts reporting, Kim Jong-Il is maintaining his lead with 100% of the vote - although it's still to early to project a winner."
Back to top Go down
View user profile
JIMBIALEK
은색 party member 은색


Posts : 239
Join date : 2008-07-14

PostSubject: Re: 100% Vote for Kim Jong Il   Fri Mar 13, 2009 8:10 am

And just think of all the money they save, with no need for campaign fundraising ...........
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Dear Leader
Divine Administrator
avatar

Posts : 560
Join date : 2008-03-30

PostSubject: Re: 100% Vote for Kim Jong Il   Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:55 pm

Once there are a few more members in here, we'll be holding an election for Divine Administrator - guess who will be the only candidate? Cool
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://www.pyongyangtrafficgirls.com
JIMBIALEK
은색 party member 은색


Posts : 239
Join date : 2008-07-14

PostSubject: Re: 100% Vote for Kim Jong Il   Mon Mar 16, 2009 8:26 am

Me?
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Dear Leader
Divine Administrator
avatar

Posts : 560
Join date : 2008-03-30

PostSubject: Re: 100% Vote for Kim Jong Il   Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:19 pm

JIMBIALEK wrote:
Me?
No.
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://www.pyongyangtrafficgirls.com
JIMBIALEK
은색 party member 은색


Posts : 239
Join date : 2008-07-14

PostSubject: Re: 100% Vote for Kim Jong Il   Mon Mar 23, 2009 7:07 am

Dear Leader wrote:
JIMBIALEK wrote:
Me?
No.
You?
Back to top Go down
View user profile
 
100% Vote for Kim Jong Il
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You can reply to topics in this forum
PyongyangTrafficGirls.com :: Back In The DPRK :: DPRK General Discussion-
Post new topic   Reply to topicJump to: